Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T

The average score is effectively tied at 6.4 vs 6.3. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.103. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) is faster at 13.32s vs 68.74s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 60.6%.

Recommended modelLing 3.0 Flash (high)It has the best score here (6.4), while responding about 5.2x faster than Ring-2.6-1T (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T medium Release: 2026-05-10
Score 6.4 6.3
Rank #114 #115
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 60.6%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.629
Total Cost $0.000 $0.103
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,224 113,604
Output Tokens 92,393 123,079
Reasoning Tokens 211,994 42,754
Response Time (avg) 13.32s 68.74s
Response Time (max) 75.27s 304.19s
Response Time (total) 292.99s 1374.86s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

#115 Ring-2.6-1T

medium
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 59.65s 834 1,369 3,985

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair