Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low) leads on average score with 6.5 vs 6.4. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.621. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) is faster at 13.32s vs 16.26s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low Release: 2026-05-08 Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available
Score 6.5 6.4
Rank #111 #114
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 9.2 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 63.6%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.170 0.000
Total Cost $0.621 $0.000
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,224 132,224
Output Tokens 7,759 92,393
Reasoning Tokens 390,126 211,994
Response Time (avg) 16.26s 13.32s
Response Time (max) 318.02s 75.27s
Response Time (total) 357.64s 292.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#111 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

low
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.0s
Tokens
1,479 tok

#114 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.53s 8,132 471 1,072
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair