Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

The average score is effectively tied at 6.4 vs 6.4. Ling 3.0 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.073. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is faster at 9.85s vs 13.32s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 48.5%.

Recommended modelQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-24

Metric Ling 3.0 Flash Ling 3.0 Flash high Release: 2026-07-24 Free Available Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Release: 2026-02-15
Score 6.4 6.4
Rank #114 #113
Reliability 9.4 10.0
Consistency 8.6 9.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 48.5%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.751
Total Cost $0.000 $0.073
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 132,224 102,646
Output Tokens 92,393 29,370
Reasoning Tokens 211,994 0
Response Time (avg) 13.32s 9.85s
Response Time (max) 75.27s 123.00s
Response Time (total) 292.99s 157.63s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 Ling 3.0 Flash

high
Cost
$0.000
Time
30.7s
Tokens
10,576 tok

#113 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

none
Cost
$0.012
Time
153.2s
Tokens
7,787 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Flash 6.7 5.0 66.7% 2 14.85s 8,298 15,602 32,152
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.05s 7,913 473 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair