Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-4o-mini

GPT-4o-mini leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.010. GPT-4o-mini is faster at 1.99s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 22.7%.

Recommended modelGPT-4o-miniIt has the best score here (5.0), while responding about 5.4x faster than Ling-2.6-flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o-mini none Release: 2024-07-18
Score 4.9 5.0
Rank #187 #183
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 22.7%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 0.195
Total Cost $0.002 $0.010
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 53,136
Output Tokens 14,903 2,911
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 1.99s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 7.58s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 29.86s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#187 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#183 GPT-4o-mini

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
742 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
GPT-4o-mini 3.2 9.6 0.0% 0 1.63s 7,314 367 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair