Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs GPT-4o-mini

GPT-4o-mini leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.8. GPT-4o-mini has the lower benchmark cost at $0.010 vs $0.632. GPT-4o-mini is faster at 1.99s vs 77.22s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 22.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#202
Total Output Tokens
953,758
Response Time (avg)
77.22s
Total Cost
$0.632
Rank
#195
Total Output Tokens
2,911
Response Time (avg)
1.99s
Total Cost
$0.010
Recommended model GPT-4o-mini

It has the best score here (5.0), while costing about 65.0x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high Release: 2026-07-28 GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o-mini none Release: 2024-07-18
Score 4.8 5.0
Rank #202 #195
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.2 9.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 22.7%
Flaky tests 8 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.640 0.195
Total Cost $0.632 $0.010
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,767 53,136
Output Tokens 286,218 2,911
Reasoning Tokens 667,540 0
Response Time (avg) 77.22s 1.99s
Response Time (max) 510.21s 7.58s
Response Time (total) 1698.89s 29.86s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#202 Trinity Large Thinking

high
Cost
$0.028
Time
130.1s
Tokens
34,387 tok

#195 GPT-4o-mini

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
742 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 3.7 4.7 33.3% 2 245.04s 7,204 83,616 266,836
GPT-4o-mini 3.2 9.6 0.0% 0 1.63s 7,314 367 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair