Navigate
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs GPT-4o-mini

GPT-4o-mini leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.8. GPT-4o-mini has the lower benchmark cost at $0.010 vs $0.592. GPT-4o-mini is faster at 1.92s vs 75.86s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 22.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#288
Total Output Tokens
932,619
Response Time (avg)
75.86s
Total Cost
$0.592
Rank
#279
Total Output Tokens
2,913
Response Time (avg)
1.92s
Total Cost
$0.010
Recommended model GPT-4o-mini

It has the best score here (5.0), while costing about 60.8x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high Release: 2026-07-28 GPT-4o-mini GPT-4o-mini none Release: 2024-07-18
Score 4.8 5.0
Rank #288 #279
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.2 9.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.4% 22.7%
Flaky tests 8 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 12.473 0.195
Total Cost $0.592 $0.010
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $0.800 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,776 53,145
Output Tokens 276,367 2,913
Reasoning Tokens 656,252 0
Response Time (avg) 75.86s 1.92s
Response Time (max) 510.21s 7.58s
Response Time (total) 1668.93s 30.71s
Parameters 398B total (13B active) ~8B
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#288 Trinity Large Thinking

high
Cost
$0.028
Time
130.1s
Tokens
34,387 tok

#279 GPT-4o-mini

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
742 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 3.7 4.7 33.3% 2 245.04s 7,204 83,616 266,836
GPT-4o-mini 3.2 9.6 0.0% 0 1.63s 7,314 367 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair