Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-1T vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Summary

Ling-2.6-1T vs GLM 4.7 Flash benchmark comparison: GLM 4.7 Flash leads on average score with 4.4 vs 4.3. Ling-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.054. Ling-2.6-1T is faster at 7.72s vs 35.10s, with pass rates of 14.3% vs 33.3%.

Recommended model: Ling-2.6-1T - Its score stays close to the best score here (4.3 vs 4.4), while costing about 12.9x less than GLM 4.7 Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-04-23 GLM 4.7 Flash GLM 4.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-01-19
Score 4.3 4.4
Rank #159 #158
Reliability N/A 6.7
Consistency 10.0 6.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 14.3% 33.3%
Flaky tests 0 8
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.000 1.337
Total Cost $0.005 $0.054
Input Price $0.075 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.625 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,905 37,206
Output Tokens 2,434 43,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 89,079
Response Time (avg) 7.72s 35.10s
Response Time (max) 25.72s 174.55s
Response Time (total) 139.00s 456.24s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#159 Ling-2.6-1T

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#158 GLM 4.7 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
186.2s
Tokens
12,112 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.4 10.0 0.0% 0 6.55s 726 777 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 4.7 5.9 41.7% 2 14.95s 555 1,122 6,110
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.2 7.4 11.1% 1 55.33s 3,106 4,981 22,387
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 23.53s 9,030 183 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 2.8 2.1 33.3% 1 65.57s 17,185 2,585 20,648
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.37s 8,313 285 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 1.51s 7,107 584 2,755
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.04s 810 27 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.5 4.4 33.3% 2 174.55s 643 33,000 25,394
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 20.34s 540 140 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.6 9.7 0.0% 0 18.14s 318 18 2,138
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 6.4 10.0 50.0% 0 5.36s 732 81 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 2.97s 636 388 2,181
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 5.36s 729 131 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 12.93s 521 781 5,255
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 25.72s 13,212 429 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.95s 6,949 224 1,014
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-1T 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
GLM 4.7 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 11.13s 186 71 1,197

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Ling-2.6-1TnonevsQwen3.5-9BmediumMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumQwen3.5-9BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumQwen3.6 35B A3BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMiMo-V2-FlashnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumTrinity Large PreviewnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGPT-5.4 NanononevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGranite 4.1 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing-2.6-1TnonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGPT-4o-mininonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumGPT-5.4 MininonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMiMo-V2.5nonevsGLM 4.7 Flashmedium