#185 Mercury 2
none- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 1.8s
- Tokens
- 1,514 tok
Inception: Mercury 2 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 leads on average score with 5.1 vs 4.6. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.030. Mercury 2 is faster at 829ms vs 4.62s, with pass rates of 22.7% vs 25.8%.
Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5It has the strongest score in this comparison (5.1) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Last updated at: 2026-07-18
| Metric | Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none | MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.6 | 5.1 |
| Rank | #185 | #164 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.2 | 9.6 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 22.7% | 25.8% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.734 | 0.770 |
| Total Cost | $0.030 | $0.025 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.750 / 1M | $0.280 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 88,704 | 141,043 |
| Output Tokens | 9,564 | 16,464 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 829ms | 4.62s |
| Response Time (max) | 4.52s | 55.36s |
| Response Time (total) | 18.24s | 101.57s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#164 MiMo-V2.5
none- Cost
- $0.007
- Time
- 267.4s
- Tokens
- 25,283 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Mistral Small 4mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneCobuddymediumvsMercury 2noneMercury 2nonevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.5mediumMiniMax M2.7mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowvsMiMo-V2.5noneMercury 2nonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumMercury 2nonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumQwen3 Coder NextmediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneCobuddymediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5mediumvsMiMo-V2.5noneMercury 2nonevsMistral Small 4medium