Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Inception: Mercury 2 vs Poolside: Laguna S 2.1

Mercury 2 leads on average score with 4.6 vs 4.5. Laguna S 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.030. Mercury 2 is faster at 829ms vs 11.67s, with pass rates of 22.7% vs 15.2%.

Recommended modelMercury 2It has the best score here (4.6), while responding about 14.1x faster than Laguna S 2.1.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric Mercury 2 Mercury 2 none Release: 2026-02-24 Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.6 4.5
Rank #198 #200
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 22.7% 15.2%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.734 1.205
Total Cost $0.030 $0.025
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $0.750 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 88,704 125,598
Output Tokens 9,564 57,634
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 829ms 11.67s
Response Time (max) 4.52s 200.52s
Response Time (total) 18.24s 256.80s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#198 Mercury 2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
1.8s
Tokens
1,514 tok

#200 Laguna S 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
7.6s
Tokens
1,345 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Mercury 2 3.4 9.6 0.0% 0 1.03s 7,229 3,088 0
Laguna S 2.1 3.4 9.7 0.0% 0 550ms 7,917 424 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair