Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

Gemma 4 31B vs GLM 5.1 benchmark comparison: Gemma 4 31B leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.6. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.004 vs $0.063. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 4.05s vs 4.10s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 41.3%.

Recommended model: Gemma 4 31B - It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 20.7x less than GLM 5.1.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 6.1 5.6
Rank #101 #120
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 41.3%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.034 0.843
Total Cost $0.004 $0.063
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.975 / 1M
Output Price $0.350 / 1M $4.301 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 20,911 47,133
Output Tokens 1,407 3,754
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.05s 4.10s
Response Time (max) 26.13s 32.57s
Response Time (total) 76.87s 86.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#101 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#120 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.85s 852 45 0
GLM 5.1 4.0 6.3 25.0% 2 2.11s 555 305 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
GLM 5.1 2.8 2.1 33.3% 1 32.57s 22,831 2,129 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.25s 8,352 285 0
GLM 5.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.08s 7,107 204 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.22s 903 27 0
GLM 5.1 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 1.99s 687 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.09s 576 117 0
GLM 5.1 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 790ms 477 39 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 2.84s 795 78 0
GLM 5.1 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 1.98s 636 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 6.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.23s 828 108 0
GLM 5.1 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 1.45s 609 151 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
GLM 5.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.68s 6,789 300 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.25s 224 12 0
GLM 5.1 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.34s 186 11 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair