Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

MiniMax: MiniMax M2.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.1

Summary

GLM 5.1 leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.2. GLM 5.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.057 vs $0.100. GLM 5.1 is faster at 4.10s vs 38.18s, with pass rates of 46.0% vs 41.3%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.1It has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 1.8x less than MiniMax M2.7 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax M2.7 medium Release: 2026-03-18 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none Release: 2026-04-07
Score 5.2 5.6
Rank #154 #141
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.8 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 46.0% 41.3%
Flaky tests 8 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 2.494 0.843
Total Cost $0.100 $0.057
Input Price $0.240 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $0.960 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,371 47,133
Output Tokens 8,981 3,754
Reasoning Tokens 89,812 0
Response Time (avg) 38.18s 4.10s
Response Time (max) 196.21s 32.57s
Response Time (total) 763.60s 86.18s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#154 MiniMax M2.7

medium
Cost
$0.022
Time
22.8s
Tokens
9,250 tok

#141 GLM 5.1

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
MiniMax M2.7 5.7 9.1 33.3% 0 101.89s 2,961 1,231 38,841
GLM 5.1 3.9 9.7 0.0% 0 4.96s 7,256 525 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair