Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 6.6. Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.096 vs $0.197. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 103.83s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 68.2%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while responding about 23.0x faster than Gemma 4 26B A4B (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B medium Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 6.6 7.4
Rank #104 #67
Reliability 9.4 9.9
Consistency 9.2 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 68.2%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.643 1.582
Total Cost $0.096 $0.197
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $0.350 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 77,550 95,983
Output Tokens 28,036 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 219,491 0
Response Time (avg) 103.83s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 912.19s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 2180.47s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemma 4 26B A4B

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#67 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 272.54s 5,062 14,838 44,567
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair