Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.6 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.006 vs $0.667. Qwen3.5-Flash is faster at 3.58s vs 18.64s, with pass rates of 98.4% vs 39.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3 Flash Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Release: 2025-12-17 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 9.6 6.1
Rank #2 #121
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.4% 39.7%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.335 0.075
Total Cost $0.667 $0.006
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,017 46,439
Output Tokens 2,006 4,276
Reasoning Tokens 214,153 0
Response Time (avg) 18.64s 3.58s
Response Time (max) 117.26s 27.18s
Response Time (total) 391.35s 75.28s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

medium
Cost
$0.010
Time
17.9s
Tokens
3,236 tok

#121 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 84.40s 8,122 462 161,084
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair