Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Summary

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.6 vs 6.8. Qwen3.5-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.080 vs $0.667. Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) is faster at 18.64s vs 63.29s, with pass rates of 98.4% vs 71.4%.

Recommended modelGemini 3 Flash Preview (medium)It has the best score here (9.6), while responding about 3.4x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Release: 2025-12-17 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 9.6 6.8
Rank #2 #87
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.1
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.4% 71.4%
Flaky tests 1 5
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.335 0.871
Total Cost $0.667 $0.080
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,017 38,926
Output Tokens 2,006 2,088
Reasoning Tokens 214,153 294,598
Response Time (avg) 18.64s 63.29s
Response Time (max) 117.26s 234.29s
Response Time (total) 391.35s 1265.85s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

medium
Cost
$0.010
Time
17.9s
Tokens
3,236 tok

#87 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 84.40s 8,122 462 161,084
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair