Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Qwen3.5-Flash vs GLM 5.2 benchmark comparison: GLM 5.2 leads on average score with 7.1 vs 6.8. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.076 vs $0.080. GLM 5.2 is faster at 6.34s vs 63.29s, with pass rates of 71.4% vs 60.3%.

Recommended model: GLM 5.2 - It has the best score here (7.1), while responding about 10.0x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash.

Last updated at: 2026-06-17

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash medium Release: 2026-02-24 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.8 7.1
Rank #70 #61
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.1 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.4% 60.3%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.871 0.628
Total Cost $0.080 $0.076
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 38,926 38,671
Output Tokens 2,088 4,817
Reasoning Tokens 294,598 0
Response Time (avg) 63.29s 6.34s
Response Time (max) 234.29s 20.69s
Response Time (total) 1265.85s 133.19s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#70 Qwen3.5-Flash

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
25.8s
Tokens
4,294 tok

#61 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 59.11s 672 383 32,992
GLM 5.2 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 3.70s 567 313 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 58.87s 6,685 302 90,081
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.78s 14,934 483 8,270
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 20.69s 14,296 1,489 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 7.3 5.9 83.3% 1 56.99s 6,061 235 16,237
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.17s 7,113 204 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 146.50s 581 58 43,615
GLM 5.2 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 6.50s 696 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 40.05s 516 99 38,486
GLM 5.2 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 4.42s 480 82 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 63.49s 699 98 14,139
GLM 5.2 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 3.84s 642 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 27.61s 381 89 12,457
GLM 5.2 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.31s 618 265 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.33s 8,193 309 1,284
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.76s 6,807 400 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 48.98s 204 32 37,037
GLM 5.2 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.41s 189 13 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair