Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 9.9 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.831. Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) is faster at 10.11s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 98.5% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.6 Flash (medium)It has the best score here (9.9), while responding about 3.2x faster than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-21 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 9.9 6.5
Rank #1 #107
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.5% 69.7%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.955 3.124
Total Cost $0.831 $0.082
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $7.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 66,293 105,447
Output Tokens 2,000 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 95,464 230,682
Response Time (avg) 10.11s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 68.03s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 222.33s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3.6 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.079
Time
47.9s
Tokens
10,532 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.49s 8,136 474 40,157
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair