Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

LongCat 2.0 (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.391. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) is faster at 32.20s vs 100.31s, with pass rates of 53.0% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (6.5 vs 6.7), while costing about 4.8x less than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Release: 2026-07-20 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.7 6.5
Rank #96 #107
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 53.0% 69.7%
Flaky tests 3 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.910 3.124
Total Cost $0.391 $0.082
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 90,909 105,447
Output Tokens 5,679 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 297,369 230,682
Response Time (avg) 100.31s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 560.39s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 2206.82s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Cost
$0.024
Time
428.0s
Tokens
19,557 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair