Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) leads on average score with 6.7 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.145. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low) is faster at 2.25s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (low)It has the best score here (6.7), while responding about 14.3x faster than MiMo-V2.5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite low Release: 2026-07-21 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.7 6.5
Rank #95 #107
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 69.7%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.201 3.124
Total Cost $0.145 $0.082
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 144,622 105,447
Output Tokens 15,302 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 24,971 230,682
Response Time (avg) 2.25s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 13.50s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 49.58s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#95 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

low
Cost
$0.008
Time
7.7s
Tokens
3,056 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 4.1 7.9 11.1% 1 672ms 8,136 463 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair