Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. MiMo-V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.082 vs $0.369. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) is faster at 6.01s vs 32.20s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 69.7%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5 (medium)It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 4.5x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 medium Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #104 #107
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 7.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 69.7%
Flaky tests 7 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.074 3.124
Total Cost $0.369 $0.082
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 105,447
Output Tokens 11,677 7,120
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 230,682
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 32.20s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 162.44s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 708.46s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#107 MiMo-V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
54.8s
Tokens
5,247 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
MiMo-V2.5 6.2 4.7 66.7% 2 97.14s 7,422 557 81,977

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair