Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) vs Qwen3.6 27B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.369 vs $0.680. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium) is faster at 6.01s vs 106.32s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 59.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#108
Total Output Tokens
133,288
Response Time (avg)
6.01s
Total Cost
$0.369
Rank
#109
Total Output Tokens
274,192
Response Time (avg)
106.32s
Total Cost
$0.680
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium)

It has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 1.8x less than Qwen3.6 27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Release: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.5 6.5
Rank #108 #109
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 59.1%
Flaky tests 7 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.074 7.319
Total Cost $0.369 $0.680
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $2.500 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 118,818 106,167
Output Tokens 11,677 32,889
Reasoning Tokens 121,611 241,303
Response Time (avg) 6.01s 106.32s
Response Time (max) 49.03s 1085.11s
Response Time (total) 132.30s 2339.12s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#108 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.015
Time
16.4s
Tokens
5,971 tok

#109 Qwen3.6 27B

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
39.6s
Tokens
3,090 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 142.99s 5,051 7,968 43,367

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair