Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads on average score with 6.6 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.047 vs $0.231. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) is faster at 1.86s vs 7.82s, with pass rates of 51.5% vs 60.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#134
Total Output Tokens
11,118
Response Time (avg)
1.86s
Total Cost
$0.047
Rank
#110
Total Output Tokens
19,257
Response Time (avg)
7.82s
Total Cost
$0.231
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)

Its score stays close to the best score here (6.1 vs 6.6), while costing about 5.0x less than Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.1 6.6
Rank #134 #110
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.9 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 51.5% 60.6%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.465 2.061
Total Cost $0.047 $0.231
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 119,065 106,339
Output Tokens 11,118 19,257
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.86s 7.82s
Response Time (max) 12.97s 102.62s
Response Time (total) 40.88s 172.01s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#134 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#110 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

none
Cost
$0.025
Time
83.9s
Tokens
4,066 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 3.8 7.3 22.2% 1 3.12s 7,913 456 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair