Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

Qwen3.7 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.060. Qwen3.7 Flash (high) is faster at 39.77s vs 49.75s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#53
Total Output Tokens
168,165
Response Time (avg)
49.75s
Total Cost
$0.060
Rank
#48
Total Output Tokens
359,703
Response Time (avg)
39.77s
Total Cost
$0.051
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash high Release: 2026-07-28
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #53 #48
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 7.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 72.7%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.402 0.387
Total Cost $0.060 $0.051
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $0.130 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,392 116,322
Output Tokens 14,478 12,332
Reasoning Tokens 153,687 347,371
Response Time (avg) 49.75s 39.77s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 431.47s
Response Time (total) 1094.41s 875.01s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#53 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#48 Qwen3.7 Flash

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
Qwen3.7 Flash 8.2 9.7 66.7% 0 58.84s 7,893 503 62,350

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair