Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Meituan: LongCat 2.0

LongCat 2.0 leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.2. LongCat 2.0 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.066. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.40s vs 5.18s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 36.4%.

Recommended modelLongCat 2.0It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.2 6.3
Rank #127 #122
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 36.4%
Flaky tests 4 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.814 0.627
Total Cost $0.066 $0.044
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,197 108,743
Output Tokens 14,746 9,372
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.40s 5.18s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 48.38s
Response Time (total) 96.84s 113.95s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#127 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#122 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair