#184 Cobuddy
medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Cobuddy vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
Inkling leads on average score with 5.2 vs 4.7. Cobuddy (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.147. Inkling is faster at 3.50s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 28.8%.
Recommended modelInklingIt has the best score here (5.2), while responding about 11.4x faster than Cobuddy (medium).
Last updated at: 2026-07-18
| Metric | Cobuddy Cobuddy medium | Inkling Inkling none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7 | 5.2 |
| Rank | #184 | #160 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 45.5% | 28.8% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 2.448 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.147 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $1.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $4.050 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 37,449 | 104,111 |
| Output Tokens | 1,677 | 10,551 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 116,703 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 39.90s | 3.50s |
| Response Time (max) | 309.02s | 48.02s |
| Response Time (total) | 797.98s | 77.09s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#160 Thinking Machines: Inkling
none
Provider returned error
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 5.3s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
CobuddymediumvsMercury 2noneTrinity Large PreviewnonevsCobuddymediumCobuddymediumvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneMistral Small 4mediumvsInklingnoneCobuddymediumvsGPT-5.4 NanononeCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneKAT-Coder-Air V2.5lowvsInklingnoneMiniMax M2.7mediumvsInklingnoneCobuddymediumvsLing-2.6-flashnoneCobuddymediumvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableCobuddymediumvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneCobuddymediumvsGPT-4o-mininone