Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Cobuddy (medium) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Cobuddy (medium) leads on average score with 4.7 vs 4.0. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.0 Tiny is faster at 14.02s vs 39.90s, with pass rates of 45.5% vs 9.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-23

Compared models

Rank
#321
Total Output Tokens
118,380
Response Time (avg)
39.90s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#338
Total Output Tokens
110,071
Response Time (avg)
14.02s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Cobuddy (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (4.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Cobuddy Cobuddy medium Release: 2026-05-06 Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny none Release: 2026-08-07
Score 4.7 4.0
Rank #321 #338
Reliability 10.0 9.8
Consistency 7.2 10.0
Attempts 63/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 45.5% 9.1%
Flaky tests 6 0
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,449 184,579
Output Tokens 1,677 110,071
Reasoning Tokens 116,703 0
Response Time (avg) 39.90s 14.02s
Response Time (max) 309.02s 240.61s
Response Time (total) 797.98s 294.46s
Parameters ~21B total (~3B active) 7.9B total (1.3B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#321 Cobuddy

medium
No endpoints found for baidu/cobuddy:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.1s
Tokens
0 tok

#338 Ling 3.0 Tiny

none
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
334.1s
Tokens
32,913 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Cobuddy 3.7 6.7 22.2% 1 79.17s 4,726 358 30,138
Ling 3.0 Tiny 4.2 10.0 0.0% 0 1.19s 8,307 798 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair