Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (low) vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.656. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 96.78s, with pass rates of 48.5% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#145
Total Output Tokens
815,220
Response Time (avg)
96.78s
Total Cost
$0.656
Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 10.7x less than Trinity Large Thinking (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking low Release: 2026-07-28 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #145 #139
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 48.5% 34.9%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.199 0.935
Total Cost $0.656 $0.062
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 122,845 139,788
Output Tokens 117,704 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 697,516 0
Response Time (avg) 96.78s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 540.96s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 2129.13s 82.38s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#145 Trinity Large Thinking

low
Cost
$0.021
Time
173.2s
Tokens
24,586 tok

#139 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 344.45s 5,441 27,039 217,241
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair