Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (low) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.046 vs $0.656. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.75s vs 96.78s, with pass rates of 48.5% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#145
Total Output Tokens
815,220
Response Time (avg)
96.78s
Total Cost
$0.656
Rank
#137
Total Output Tokens
10,723
Response Time (avg)
1.75s
Total Cost
$0.046
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 14.4x less than Trinity Large Thinking (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking low Release: 2026-07-28 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none Release: 2026-05-08
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #145 #137
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.9 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 48.5% 50.0%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.199 0.507
Total Cost $0.656 $0.046
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 122,845 118,050
Output Tokens 117,704 10,723
Reasoning Tokens 697,516 0
Response Time (avg) 96.78s 1.75s
Response Time (max) 540.96s 16.25s
Response Time (total) 2129.13s 38.60s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#145 Trinity Large Thinking

low
Cost
$0.021
Time
173.2s
Tokens
24,586 tok

#137 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
4.5s
Tokens
727 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 344.45s 5,441 27,039 217,241
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 938ms 8,128 666 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair