- Rank
- #237
- Total Output Tokens
- 818,359
- Response Time (avg)
- 96.61s
- Total Cost
- $0.625
Trinity Large Thinking (low) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
The average score is effectively tied at 6.0 vs 6.0. Gemini 2.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.017 vs $0.625. Gemini 2.5 Flash is faster at 6.19s vs 96.61s, with pass rates of 47.0% vs 39.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #238
- Total Output Tokens
- 1,890
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.19s
- Total Cost
- $0.017
Recommended model
Gemini 2.5 Flash
It has the best score here (6.0), while costing about 37.4x less than Trinity Large Thinking (low).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking low | Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Rank | #237 | #238 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 47.0% | 39.4% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 8.221 | 0.209 |
| Total Cost | $0.625 | $0.017 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $2.500 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 122,854 | 39,886 |
| Output Tokens | 119,810 | 1,890 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 698,549 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 96.61s | 6.19s |
| Response Time (max) | 540.96s | 118.00s |
| Response Time (total) | 2125.51s | 136.23s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | ~350B total (~20B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#237 Trinity Large Thinking
low- Cost
- $0.021
- Time
- 173.2s
- Tokens
- 24,586 tok
#238 Gemini 2.5 Flash
none
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.164
- Time
- 215.5s
- Tokens
- 65,659 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 5.70s | 663 | 1,451 | 5,431 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 582ms | 492 | 102 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 344.45s | 5,441 | 27,039 | 217,241 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 736ms | 8,122 | 483 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 5.2 | 6.0 | 33.3% | 1 | 291.02s | 99,467 | 9,848 | 234,039 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 61.19s | 16,470 | 486 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 14.30s | 6,906 | 459 | 9,451 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 652ms | 7,257 | 279 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 140.26s | 756 | 72,049 | 217,598 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 449ms | 642 | 12 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.65s | 501 | 5,138 | 5,695 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 615ms | 486 | 78 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.4 | 6.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 4.07s | 684 | 45 | 3,710 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 590ms | 615 | 72 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3.28s | 678 | 2,625 | 3,077 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 604ms | 558 | 132 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.19s | 7,551 | 299 | 1,430 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.91s | 5,088 | 234 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.10s | 207 | 857 | 877 | |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.15s | 156 | 12 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinglowvsNemotron 3 UltranoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20noneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGemma 4 31BnoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.6 FlashnoneGemini 2.5 FlashnonevsGPT-5 NanomediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.5-FlashmediumTrinity Large ThinkingmediumvsGemini 2.5 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitenoneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large Thinkinglowvsgpt-oss-120bmediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGPT-5 Nanomedium