Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Trinity Large Thinking (low) vs gpt-oss-120b (medium)

gpt-oss-120b (medium) leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. gpt-oss-120b (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.019 vs $0.656. gpt-oss-120b (medium) is faster at 21.91s vs 96.78s, with pass rates of 48.5% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#145
Total Output Tokens
815,220
Response Time (avg)
96.78s
Total Cost
$0.656
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
97,816
Response Time (avg)
21.91s
Total Cost
$0.019
Recommended model gpt-oss-120b (medium)

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 35.0x less than Trinity Large Thinking (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking low Release: 2026-07-28 gpt-oss-120b gpt-oss-120b medium Release: 2025-08-05
Score 6.0 6.1
Rank #145 #135
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.9 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 48.5% 50.0%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.199 0.221
Total Cost $0.656 $0.019
Input Price $0.220 / 1M $0.037 / 1M
Output Price $0.850 / 1M $0.170 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 122,845 108,747
Output Tokens 117,704 29,772
Reasoning Tokens 697,516 68,044
Response Time (avg) 96.78s 21.91s
Response Time (max) 540.96s 68.16s
Response Time (total) 2129.13s 328.70s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#145 Trinity Large Thinking

low
Cost
$0.021
Time
173.2s
Tokens
24,586 tok

#135 gpt-oss-120b

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
26.7s
Tokens
555 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Thinking 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 344.45s 5,441 27,039 217,241
gpt-oss-120b 5.9 7.0 55.6% 1 38.37s 7,782 3,365 11,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair