- Score
- 8.6 (+2.30 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.061 · 93.4% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 7.51s · 92.1% faster
Arcee AI
Release: 2026-07-28
Tested on: 2026-10-01 09:30
arcee-ai/trinity-large-thinking::low
398B total (13B active)MoEWeights available
Summary
Trinity Large Thinking scores 6.3 on AI BENCHY and ranks #267. It has 10.0 reliability, a 47.8% pass rate, $0.918 total cost, and 95.16s average response time.
What makes Trinity Large Thinking unique: It stands out most in General Intelligence, where it ranks #1, while Instructions following is its weakest area at #15. It uses unusually many reasoning tokens, which can help explain its slower or more expensive runs.
Recommended alternatives
We recommend choosing one of these models instead:
- Score
- 9.4 (+3.08 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.183 · 80.1% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 6.24s · 93.4% faster
- Score
- 8.3 (+1.99 points)
- Total Cost (Current Price)
- $0.047 · 94.9% cheaper
- Response Time (avg)
- 18.07s · 81.0% faster
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 398B total (13B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Weights available
- License
- OpenMDW
6.3
Consistency
8.1
10.0
Total Output Tokens
765,746
Total Input Tokens
347,980
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$0.800 / 1M
Cache Read Price
$0.060 / 1M
Cache Write Price
N/A
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Flaky tests
6
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#267 Trinity Large Thinking
low- Cost
- $0.021
- Time
- 173.2s
- Tokens
- 24,586 tok
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 09:30 Re-test | 6.3 | 10.0 | $0.918 ↑ | Current run | |
| 2026-07-28 10:52 Initial run | 6.0 | 9.7 | $0.656 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Price History
Historical pricing data for this model from OpenRouter.
| Date | Input Price | Output Price | Cache Read Price | Cache Write Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 12:51 | $0.220 / 1M | $0.850 / 1M | N/A | N/A |
| 2026-10-01 18:33 | $0.250 / 1M | $0.800 / 1M | $0.060 / 1M | N/A |
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Trinity Large ThinkinglowvsDeepSeek V3.2mediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423noneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGrok 4.20mediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsLing 3.1 FlashlowTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsSpace Bunny AlphaxhighTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5mediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsSolar Pro 4highTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731none
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 7.4 | 3.8 | |
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 5.2 | 6.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 7.2 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 4.4 | 6.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 6.3 | 7.9 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |