- Rank
- #226
- Total Output Tokens
- 842,200
- Response Time (avg)
- 95.16s
- Total Cost
- $0.918
Trinity Large Thinking (low) vs Ling 3.1 Flash (low)
The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.918. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) is faster at 85.22s vs 95.16s, with pass rates of 47.8% vs 66.7%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #222
- Total Output Tokens
- 704,170
- Response Time (avg)
- 85.22s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Trinity Large Thinking (low)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking low | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Rank | #226 | #222 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.7 |
| Consistency | 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 47.8% | 66.7% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 9.163 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.918 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.060 / 1M | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 347,980 | 271,890 |
| Output Tokens | 121,898 | 190,841 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 720,302 | 513,329 |
| Response Time (avg) | 95.16s | 85.22s |
| Response Time (max) | 540.96s | 432.81s |
| Response Time (total) | 2188.74s | 1960.12s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 560B total (25B active) |
| Availability | Weights available | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#226 Trinity Large Thinking
low- Cost
- $0.021
- Time
- 173.2s
- Tokens
- 24,586 tok
#222 Ling 3.1 Flash
low- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 133.5s
- Tokens
- 12,950 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 7.4 | 3.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 63.23s | 225,126 | 2,088 | 21,753 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.51s | 148,137 | 12,034 | 14,574 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 8.3 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 5.70s | 663 | 1,451 | 5,431 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 750 | 1,268 | 3,167 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 344.45s | 5,441 | 27,039 | 217,241 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.6 | 4.2 | 66.7% | 2 | 107.30s | 8,298 | 20,816 | 86,330 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 5.2 | 6.0 | 33.3% | 1 | 291.02s | 99,467 | 9,848 | 234,039 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 235.14s | 95,366 | 29,960 | 91,357 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 14.30s | 6,906 | 459 | 9,451 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.83s | 8,016 | 1,507 | 4,078 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 140.26s | 756 | 72,049 | 217,598 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 274.59s | 837 | 118,155 | 260,533 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.65s | 501 | 5,138 | 5,695 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.47s | 546 | 10 | 2,835 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.4 | 6.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 4.07s | 684 | 45 | 3,710 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.82s | 744 | 324 | 1,374 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 7.9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3.28s | 678 | 2,625 | 3,077 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.9 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 32.80s | 747 | 4,505 | 31,642 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.19s | 7,551 | 299 | 1,430 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 24.17s | 8,221 | 884 | 6,373 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.10s | 207 | 857 | 877 | |
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 40.69s | 228 | 1,378 | 11,066 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinglowvsDeepSeek V3.2mediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSolar Pro 4highTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423noneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsGrok 4.20mediumDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsLing 3.1 FlashlowTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsSolar Pro 4highLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bmedium