- Rank
- #222
- Total Output Tokens
- 704,170
- Response Time (avg)
- 85.22s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.1 Flash (low) vs Space Bunny Alpha (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Space Bunny Alpha (medium) is faster at 32.88s vs 85.22s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 55.1%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #224
- Total Output Tokens
- 192,115
- Response Time (avg)
- 32.88s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Space Bunny Alpha (medium)
It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 2.6x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (low).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low | Space Bunny Alpha Space Bunny Alpha medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Rank | #222 | #224 |
| Reliability | 9.7 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 66.7% | 55.1% |
| Flaky tests | 6 | 5 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 271,890 | 267,840 |
| Output Tokens | 190,841 | 192,115 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 513,329 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 85.22s | 32.88s |
| Response Time (max) | 432.81s | 197.32s |
| Response Time (total) | 1960.12s | 756.28s |
| Parameters | 560B total (25B active) | - |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#222 Ling 3.1 Flash
low- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 133.5s
- Tokens
- 12,950 tok
#224 Space Bunny Alpha
medium- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 35.4s
- Tokens
- 4,894 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 101.51s | 148,137 | 12,034 | 14,574 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 6.1 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 1 | 153.11s | 136,388 | 23,461 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.16s | 750 | 1,268 | 3,167 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 5.2 | 8.0 | 41.7% | 1 | 2.29s | 2,130 | 1,719 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 5.6 | 4.2 | 66.7% | 2 | 107.30s | 8,298 | 20,816 | 86,330 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 5.4 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 6.82s | 8,493 | 6,691 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 6.6 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 235.14s | 95,366 | 29,960 | 91,357 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 3.8 | 5.8 | 33.3% | 1 | 17.04s | 97,471 | 11,235 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.83s | 8,016 | 1,507 | 4,078 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.10s | 7,890 | 576 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 274.59s | 837 | 118,155 | 260,533 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 105.63s | 1,869 | 88,015 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 11.47s | 546 | 10 | 2,835 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 4.4 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.44s | 855 | 1,010 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.82s | 744 | 324 | 1,374 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.75s | 1,425 | 644 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 8.9 | 7.8 | 88.9% | 1 | 32.80s | 747 | 4,505 | 31,642 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 7.9 | 9.9 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.42s | 1,782 | 1,915 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 4.7 | 1.6 | 66.7% | 1 | 24.17s | 8,221 | 884 | 6,373 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.88s | 8,961 | 390 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.1 Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 40.69s | 228 | 1,378 | 11,066 | |
| Space Bunny Alpha | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 197.32s | 576 | 56,459 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneLing 3.1 FlashlowvsSolar Pro 4highTrinity Large ThinkinglowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15nonevsSpace Bunny AlphamediumSpace Bunny AlphamediumvsSolar Pro 4highDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsLing 3.1 FlashlowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423nonevsSpace Bunny AlphamediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumLing 3.1 FlashlowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3Bmedium