Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash (low) vs Solar Pro 4 (high)

The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.077. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) is faster at 85.22s vs 128.91s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 60.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#222
Total Output Tokens
704,170
Response Time (avg)
85.22s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#220
Total Output Tokens
402,203
Response Time (avg)
128.91s
Total Cost
$0.077
Recommended model Ling 3.1 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 1.5x faster than Solar Pro 4 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low Release: 2026-10-03 Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 high Release: 2026-08-11
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #222 #220
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.8 8.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 60.9%
Flaky tests 6 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.652
Total Cost $0.000 $0.077
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.360 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.018 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 271,890 209,002
Output Tokens 190,841 24,675
Reasoning Tokens 513,329 377,528
Response Time (avg) 85.22s 128.91s
Response Time (max) 432.81s 491.07s
Response Time (total) 1960.12s 2965.04s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) ~100B
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#222 Ling 3.1 Flash

low
Cost
$0.000
Time
133.5s
Tokens
12,950 tok

#220 Solar Pro 4

high
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
N/A
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 5.6 4.2 66.7% 2 107.30s 8,298 20,816 86,330
Solar Pro 4 5.7 9.9 33.3% 0 244.73s 7,887 18,577 101,928

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair