Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Ling 3.1 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

The average score is effectively tied at 6.3 vs 6.3. Ling 3.1 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.176. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is faster at 20.07s vs 85.22s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 52.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-03

Compared models

Rank
#222
Total Output Tokens
704,170
Response Time (avg)
85.22s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#221
Total Output Tokens
53,060
Response Time (avg)
20.07s
Total Cost
$0.176
Recommended model Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 4.2x faster than Ling 3.1 Flash (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.1 Flash Ling 3.1 Flash low Release: 2026-10-03 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Release: 2026-02-15
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #222 #221
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 7.8 9.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 52.2%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 1.593
Total Cost $0.000 $0.176
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 271,890 346,064
Output Tokens 190,841 53,060
Reasoning Tokens 513,329 0
Response Time (avg) 85.22s 20.07s
Response Time (max) 432.81s 183.50s
Response Time (total) 1960.12s 341.27s
Parameters 560B total (25B active) ~397B total (~17B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#222 Ling 3.1 Flash

low
Cost
$0.000
Time
133.5s
Tokens
12,950 tok

#221 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

none
Cost
$0.012
Time
153.2s
Tokens
7,787 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.1 Flash 5.6 4.2 66.7% 2 107.30s 8,298 20,816 86,330
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 4.3 7.9 11.1% 1 2.05s 7,913 473 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair