Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Preview vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna leads on average score with 5.4 vs 4.8. Trinity Large Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.142. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 2.98s, with pass rates of 21.2% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelTrinity Large PreviewIts score stays close to the best score here (4.8 vs 5.4), while costing about 18.3x less than GPT-5.6 Luna.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Release: 2026-01-27 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09
Score 4.8 5.4
Rank #179 #155
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 21.2% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 63 66
Cost per result 0.017 2.360
Total Cost $0.008 $0.142
Input Price $0.243 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.243 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 29,828 101,323
Output Tokens 2,169 6,709
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 2.98s 1.50s
Response Time (max) 14.34s 10.57s
Response Time (total) 56.57s 32.91s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#179 Trinity Large Preview

none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#155 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Trinity Large Preview 3.7 7.7 11.1% 1 14.34s 738 397 0
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair