Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.4. KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.077 vs $0.142. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 15.90s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.6 LunaIts score stays close to the best score here (5.4 vs 5.6), while responding about 10.6x faster than KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 high Release: 2026-07-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09
Score 5.6 5.4
Rank #144 #159
Reliability 9.9 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.8
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 34.9%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.097 2.360
Total Cost $0.077 $0.142
Input Price $0.150 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.600 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 50,470 101,323
Output Tokens 3,957 6,709
Reasoning Tokens 111,374 0
Response Time (avg) 15.90s 1.50s
Response Time (max) 118.35s 10.57s
Response Time (total) 349.71s 32.91s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#144 KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

high
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#159 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 4.3 7.3 11.1% 1 39.07s 6,948 1,166 55,883
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair