- Rank
- #335
- Total Output Tokens
- 2,169
- Response Time (avg)
- 2.83s
- Total Cost
- $0.008
Trinity Large Preview vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium)
Trinity Large Preview leads on average score with 4.4 vs 3.6. Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.008. Trinity Large Preview is faster at 2.83s vs 64.99s, with pass rates of 20.3% vs 23.2%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #356
- Total Output Tokens
- 923,276
- Response Time (avg)
- 64.99s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Trinity Large Preview
It has the best score here (4.4), while responding about 22.9x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Preview Trinity Large Preview none Free Available | Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.4 | 3.6 |
| Rank | #335 | #356 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Consistency | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Attempts | 66/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 20.3% | 23.2% |
| Flaky tests | 2 | 3 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.017 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.008 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.243 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.243 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 29,828 | 103,898 |
| Output Tokens | 2,169 | 148,304 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 774,972 |
| Response Time (avg) | 2.83s | 64.99s |
| Response Time (max) | 14.34s | 262.20s |
| Response Time (total) | 56.65s | 1429.68s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 7.9B total (1.3B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#335 Trinity Large Preview
none
No endpoints found for arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#356 Ling 3.0 Tiny
medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 177.4s
- Tokens
- 6,873 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 88ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 24ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.07s | 651 | 550 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 23.73s | 750 | 5,103 | 94,884 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.7 | 7.7 | 11.1% | 1 | 14.34s | 738 | 397 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.9 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 211.99s | 7,948 | 70,838 | 206,006 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 1.5 | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 8.91s | 12,053 | 294 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 139.78s | 76,108 | 17,871 | 126,497 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.26s | 6,900 | 186 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.7 | 5.7 | 16.7% | 1 | 4.41s | 8,016 | 2,014 | 6,755 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 877ms | 738 | 25 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 81.40s | 637 | 21,709 | 187,100 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 4.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 873ms | 498 | 104 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 31.77s | 546 | 4,275 | 30,975 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.5 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 822ms | 678 | 63 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.8 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.00s | 744 | 610 | 1,436 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.6 | 7.7 | 11.1% | 1 | 1.97s | 669 | 265 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 34.65s | 747 | 15,561 | 85,029 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.67s | 6,699 | 267 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.91s | 8,226 | 380 | 708 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 777ms | 204 | 18 | 0 | |
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 100.96s | 176 | 9,943 | 35,582 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsCobuddymediumFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsMiniMax M2.5mediumTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bnonevsLing 3.0 TinymediumTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsGranite 4.2 8BhighLing 3.0 TinymediumvsGrok 4.20noneTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree AvailableTrinity Large PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9Bmedium