Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Claude Opus 4.8 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Qwen3.7 Plus has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 12.09s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 50.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#74
Total Output Tokens
16,797
Response Time (avg)
4.91s
Total Cost
$1.166
Rank
#79
Total Output Tokens
58,097
Response Time (avg)
12.09s
Total Cost
$0.106
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Plus

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.2 vs 7.3), while costing about 11.0x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus none Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.3 7.2
Rank #74 #79
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 50.0%
Flaky tests 2 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 1.014
Total Cost $1.166 $0.106
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 98,824
Output Tokens 16,797 58,097
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 12.09s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 206.03s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 265.89s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#74 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#79 Qwen3.7 Plus

none
Cost
$0.019
Time
213.5s
Tokens
11,960 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
Qwen3.7 Plus 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.15s 7,911 639 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair