Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.2 benchmark comparison: Claude Opus 4.7 leads on average score with 8.7 vs 7.1. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.076 vs $0.679. Claude Opus 4.7 is faster at 4.73s vs 6.34s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 60.3%.

Recommended model: GLM 5.2 - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (7.1), lower cost than Claude Opus 4.7, and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Release: 2026-04-16 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 8.7 7.1
Rank #13 #61
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 60.3%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.991 0.628
Total Cost $0.679 $0.076
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 65,406 38,671
Output Tokens 11,858 4,817
Reasoning Tokens 2,198 0
Response Time (avg) 4.73s 6.34s
Response Time (max) 23.18s 20.69s
Response Time (total) 94.51s 133.19s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#13 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Cost
$0.059
Time
26.8s
Tokens
2,475 tok

#61 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 1.85s 894 348 0
GLM 5.2 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 3.70s 567 313 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 21.45s 24,501 2,369 1,084
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 20.69s 14,296 1,489 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.37s 10,533 324 0
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.17s 7,113 204 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 1.17s 630 51 0
GLM 5.2 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 6.50s 696 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.87s 723 256 0
GLM 5.2 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 4.42s 480 82 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.57s 939 114 0
GLM 5.2 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 3.84s 642 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 939 370 0
GLM 5.2 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.31s 618 265 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.17s 15,339 373 0
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.76s 6,807 400 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.7 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.25s 273 24 0
GLM 5.2 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.41s 189 13 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair