指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #78 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.131 | 2/2 | 4.32s |
| #122 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.102 | 2/2 | 2.13s |
| #230 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.7 | $1.100 | 1/2 | 1.88s |
| #47 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.096 | 2/2 | 4.24s |
| #295 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.6 | $1.095 | 1/2 | 2.58s |
| #61 | Qwen3.8 MAX low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.089 | 2/2 | 4.01s |
| #180 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 2/2 | 38.0s |
| #104 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.007 | 2/2 | 7.90s |
| #4 | GPT-6.1 Sol max | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.006 | 2/2 | 5.54s |
| #239 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.989 | 2/2 | 18.6s |
| #3 | GPT-6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.921 | 2/2 | 15.6s |
| #267 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.918 | 0/2 | 4.07s |
| #80 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.911 | 2/2 | 5.04s |
| #202 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 low | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.7 | $0.909 | 1/2 | 1.91s |
| #1 | Gemini 3.6 Flash high | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.900 | 2/2 | 4.07s |