指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #60 | Kimi K3.1 Pro low | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.836 | 2/2 | 5.84s |
| #23 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.822 | 2/2 | 3.74s |
| #31 | Claude Opus 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.804 | 2/2 | 21.3s |
| #17 | Gemini 4 Argon high | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.802 | 2/2 | 5.32s | |
| #30 | Muse Spark Open high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.782 | 2/2 | 28.5s |
| #276 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 1.0 | 0.6 | $1.752 | 2/2 | 3.38s | |
| #24 | Claude Opus 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.733 | 2/2 | 21.1s |
| #48 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.712 | 2/2 | 10.5s |
| #20 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.700 | 2/2 | 2.50s |
| #82 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.689 | 2/2 | 7.46s |
| #57 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.665 | 1/2 | 6.31s |
| #107 | Kimi K3.1 Pro high | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.646 | 2/2 | 5.71s |
| #29 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.645 | 2/2 | 5.05s |
| #44 | Muse Wonder minimal | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.639 | 1/2 | 1.39s |
| #22 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.595 | 2/2 | 2.73s |