指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↓.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #259 | Minimax M3.1 Flash medium | Minimax | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 1.72s |
| #267 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.918 | 0/2 | 4.07s |
| #270 | Space Bunny Alpha xhigh | Stealth | 0.6 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 2.22s |
| #273 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 none | DeepSeek | 0.5 | 0.6 | $0.053 | 0/2 | 1.42s |
| #278 | Trinity Large Thinking medium | Arcee AI | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.862 | 0/2 | 3.99s |
| #283 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.029 | 0/2 | 36.9s |
| #311 | Space Bunny Alpha low | Stealth | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 1.43s |
| #335 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 75.8s |
| #338 | Laguna XS 2.1 none | Poolside | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.020 | 0/2 | 364ms |
| #341 | Ling 3.0 Flash none | Inclusionai | 0.5 | 0.5 | $0.004 | 0/2 | 836ms |
| #348 | Mercury 2.5 low | Inception | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.020 | 0/2 | 972ms |
| #351 | Apodex 1.1 Mini default | Apodex | 0.5 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 1.06s |
| #352 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.092 | 0/2 | 400ms |
| #354 | MiniMax M2.7 medium | Minimax | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.326 | 0/2 | 12.8s |
| #355 | Dots 3 Note Preview default | Dots Studio | 0.5 | 0.5 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 1.06s |