指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 响应时间（平均） ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #368 | Hy3 preview high | Tencent | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.135 | 2/2 | 34.4s |
| #266 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.152 | 2/2 | 35.8s |
| #283 | Granite 4.2 8B medium | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.029 | 0/2 | 36.9s |
| #180 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 2/2 | 38.0s |
| #244 | Solar Pro 4 medium | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.098 | 2/2 | 40.1s |
| #261 | Solar Pro 4 high | Upstage | 0.8 | 0.6 | $0.077 | 1/2 | 41.5s |
| #366 | Hy4 preview none | Tencent | 0.7 | 0.5 | $0.165 | 1/2 | 47.9s |
| #210 | Solar Pro 4 xhigh | Upstage | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.067 | 1/2 | 51.3s |
| #214 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 0.8 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 1/2 | 56.4s |
| #205 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.184 | 2/2 | 63.5s |
| #395 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 1.0 | 0.4 | $2.310 | 2/2 | 64.0s | |
| #335 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 75.8s |
| #329 | Hy4 preview low | Tencent | 1.0 | 0.5 | $1.844 | 2/2 | 77.7s |
| #392 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.037 | 0/2 | 79.5s |
| #374 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 0.6 | 0.5 | $0.111 | 1/2 | 87.5s |