指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #150 | GLM 5.1 medium | Z.ai | 0.6 | 0.8 | $1.546 | 1/2 | 7.47s |
| #68 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.558 | 2/2 | 3.12s |
| #88 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.585 | 2/2 | 9.56s | |
| #56 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.590 | 2/2 | 4.40s |
| #204 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.7 | $1.594 | 2/2 | 12.5s |
| #22 | GPT-5.6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.595 | 2/2 | 2.73s |
| #44 | Muse Wonder minimal | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.639 | 1/2 | 1.39s |
| #29 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.645 | 2/2 | 5.05s |
| #107 | Kimi K3.1 Pro high | Moonshot AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.646 | 2/2 | 5.71s |
| #57 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.9 | $1.665 | 1/2 | 6.31s |
| #82 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.689 | 2/2 | 7.46s |
| #20 | GPT-5.6 Sol medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.700 | 2/2 | 2.50s |
| #48 | Muse Spark 1.3 medium | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.712 | 2/2 | 10.5s |
| #24 | Claude Opus 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.733 | 2/2 | 21.1s |
| #276 | Gemini 3.5 Flash none | 1.0 | 0.6 | $1.752 | 2/2 | 3.38s |