指令遵循 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 指令遵循 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 指标 ↑.
455/455
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 指令遵循 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #450 | Solar Decide Flash default | Upstage | 0.2 | 0.2 | $0.003 | 0/1 | 1.66s |
| #451 | Microsoft-Decision-1 default | Microsoft | 0.2 | 0.1 | $0.002 | 0/1 | 997ms |
| #453 | Tev1 4B Experimental default | Togethercomputer | 0.2 | 1.0 | $0.002 | 0/1 | 555ms |
| #454 | Nimble v3 9B default | Bespoke Labs | 0.2 | 0.8 | ~$0.001 | 0/1 | 469ms |
| #348 | Mercury 2.5 low | Inception | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.020 | 0/2 | 972ms |
| #335 | Granite 4.2 8B low | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.5 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 75.8s |
| #392 | Granite 4.2 8B none | IBM Granite | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.037 | 0/2 | 79.5s |
| #420 | Command A+ medium | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.064 | 0/2 | 103.0s |
| #426 | Command A+ high | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.079 | 0/2 | 110.3s |
| #427 | Grok 4.1 Fast default | X AI | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 685ms |
| #429 | Command A+ none | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 95.7s |
| #430 | Command A+ low | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.073 | 0/2 | 105.7s |
| #407 | Ling 3.0 Tiny default | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.4 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 2.44s |
| #391 | Trinity Large Preview default | Arcee AI | 0.4 | 0.4 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 822ms |
| #408 | Granite 4.1 8b default | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.4 | $0.007 | 0/2 | 344ms |