领域专项 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 领域专项 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 指标 ↑.
451/451
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 领域专项 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #76 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low | Qwen | 0.5 | 0.9 | $1.131 | 1/3 | 34.9s |
| #93 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 0.5 | 0.8 | $2.737 | 1/3 | 17.0s | |
| #94 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 0.5 | 0.8 | $3.409 | 1/3 | 683.6s |
| #99 | Gemini 4 Argon low | 0.5 | 0.8 | $0.438 | 1/3 | 1.94s | |
| #110 | GPT-5.6 Luna high | OpenAI | 0.5 | 0.8 | $0.118 | 1/3 | 62.9s |
| #115 | GPT-5.6 Terra low | OpenAI | 0.5 | 0.8 | $0.435 | 1/3 | 9.34s |
| #127 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 0.5 | 0.8 | $2.996 | 1/3 | 249.3s |
| #130 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 0.5 | 0.8 | $2.270 | 1/3 | 304.3s |
| #154 | Seed-2.0-Code medium | Bytedance Seed | 0.5 | 0.7 | $1.275 | 1/3 | 429.8s |
| #159 | Inkling medium | Thinkingmachines | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.527 | 1/3 | 31.6s |
| #160 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 1/3 | 35.1s | |
| #163 | Grok 4.7 medium | X AI | 0.5 | 0.7 | $2.938 | 1/3 | 300.4s |
| #169 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.567 | 1/3 | 56.0s |
| #192 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview low | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.254 | 1/3 | 9.74s | |
| #197 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 0.5 | 0.7 | $0.144 | 1/3 | 59.9s |