数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #46 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.096 | 2/2 | 10.5s |
| #284 | Claude Sonnet 5 none | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.6 | $1.095 | 2/2 | 3.01s |
| #59 | Qwen3.8 MAX low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.9 | $1.089 | 2/2 | 7.87s |
| #174 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 0/2 | 37.3s |
| #100 | GLM 5.2 medium | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.8 | $1.007 | 2/2 | 13.4s |
| #4 | GPT-6.1 Sol max | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $1.006 | 2/2 | 4.97s |
| #230 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.989 | 2/2 | 19.0s |
| #3 | GPT-6 Sol high | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.921 | 2/2 | 2.26s |
| #256 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 0.7 | 0.6 | $0.918 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #77 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.911 | 2/2 | 3.62s |
| #194 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 low | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.909 | 2/2 | 2.31s |
| #1 | Gemini 3.6 Flash high | 1.0 | 1.0 | $0.900 | 2/2 | 6.44s | |
| #71 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.885 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #64 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #103 | Seed-2.0-Code low | Bytedance Seed | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.881 | 2/2 | 24.9s |