数据解析与提取 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 数据解析与提取 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 指标 ↑.
442/442
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 数据解析与提取 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #408 | Command A+ medium | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.064 | 0/2 | 92.9s |
| #414 | Command A+ high | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.079 | 0/2 | 86.2s |
| #417 | Command A+ none | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.000 | 0/2 | 62.6s |
| #418 | Command A+ low | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.073 | 0/2 | 85.4s |
| #436 | LFM2-24B-A2B default | Liquid | 0.3 | 0.2 | $0.001 | 0/2 | 714ms |
| #438 | Microsoft-Decision-1 default | Microsoft | 0.3 | 0.1 | $0.002 | 0/2 | 1.16s |
| #440 | Tev1 4B Experimental default | Togethercomputer | 0.3 | 1.0 | $0.002 | 0/2 | 509ms |
| #441 | Nimble v3 9B default | Bespoke Labs | 0.3 | 0.8 | ~$0.001 | 0/2 | 880ms |
| #174 | Qwen3.6 27B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.7 | $1.021 | 0/2 | 37.3s |
| #162 | LongCat 2.0 high | Meituan | 0.4 | 0.7 | $0.778 | 0/2 | 11.0s |
| #390 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.4 | $0.106 | 0/2 | 87.3s |
| #293 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.159 | 0/2 | 21.4s |
| #359 | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning medium | NVIDIA | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.195 | 0/2 | 23.2s |
| #439 | Solar Decide default | Upstage | 0.4 | 0.1 | $0.009 | 0/2 | 5.00s |
| #362 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 0.4 | 0.5 | $0.111 | 0/2 | 56.5s |