综合 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 综合 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 测试正确 ↓.
311/311
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 综合 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #18 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 2/2 | 360.0s |
| #20 | Claude Fable 5.1 high | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.0 | $3.364 | 2/2 | 34.6s |
| #21 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.0 | $0.665 | 2/2 | 44.4s | |
| #22 | GPT-5.5 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $4.163 | 2/2 | 33.5s |
| #24 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $2.252 | 2/2 | 35.6s |
| #25 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.988 | 2/2 | 26.0s |
| #26 | Muse Spark 1.3 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.653 | 2/2 | 55.5s |
| #27 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 2/2 | 408.8s |
| #30 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite high | 9.9 | 8.8 | $0.540 | 2/2 | 27.9s | |
| #31 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 9.9 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 2/2 | 54.3s |
| #32 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.121 | 2/2 | 21.1s |
| #35 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/2 | 43.4s |
| #41 | Qwen3.8 Max low | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.6 | $0.702 | 2/2 | 98.2s |
| #42 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/2 | 29.8s |
| #43 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 29.0s |