编程 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 编程 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
408/408
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 编程 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #81 | Gemini 3.5 Flash high | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.737 | 3/3 | 23.0s | |
| #20 | GPT-6 Astra medium | OpenAI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.707 | 3/3 | 4.95s |
| #87 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.687 | 3/3 | 155.2s |
| #66 | Grok 4.6 high | X AI | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.629 | 3/3 | 102.2s |
| #76 | Muse Spark 1.1 high | Meta | 1.0 | 0.8 | $2.570 | 3/3 | 22.9s |
| #175 | Ember-1 high | Fireworks | 0.8 | 0.7 | $2.405 | 2/3 | 72.2s |
| #43 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 0.8 | 0.9 | $2.350 | 2/3 | 6.70s |
| #179 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 0.5 | 0.7 | $2.334 | 1/3 | 3.29s |
| #361 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high | 0.0 | 0.4 | $2.310 | 0/0 | 0ms | |
| #114 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 0.8 | 0.8 | $2.270 | 2/3 | 120.0s |
| #51 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 0.9 | 0.9 | $2.213 | 2/3 | 44.4s |
| #14 | GPT-6 Astra low | OpenAI | 1.0 | 1.0 | $2.160 | 3/3 | 3.97s |
| #24 | Claude Opus 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.9 | $2.133 | 3/3 | 13.4s |
| #217 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 0.6 | 0.6 | $2.126 | 1/3 | 33.3s |
| #344 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 0.3 | 0.5 | $2.044 | 1/1 | 137.6s |