反AI技巧 排名
看看哪些 AI 模型在 反AI技巧 上表现最好，哪些更稳定，以及差距主要出现在哪里。 排序方式: 总成本 ↓.
311/311
筛选模型
没有模型匹配当前搜索和筛选条件。
| 排名 | 模型 | 公司 | 反AI技巧 得分 | 分数 | 总成本 | 测试正确 | 响应时间（平均） |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #144 | Solar Pro 4 medium | Upstage | 8.2 | 6.8 | $0.047 | 3/4 | 53.4s |
| #182 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 8.3 | 6.1 | $0.047 | 3/4 | 1.10s | |
| #257 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.047 | 0/4 | 2.84s |
| #125 | Solar Pro 4 high | Upstage | 8.7 | 7.1 | $0.046 | 3/4 | 58.8s |
| #186 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 7.5 | 6.1 | $0.046 | 2/4 | 1.07s | |
| #235 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 low | Kwaipilot | 7.3 | 5.4 | $0.046 | 2/4 | 3.50s |
| #224 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 3.5 | 5.6 | $0.045 | 0/4 | 1.80s |
| #172 | LongCat 2.0 none | Meituan | 4.8 | 6.4 | $0.044 | 1/4 | 2.87s |
| #61 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 low | DeepSeek | 8.2 | 8.0 | $0.044 | 3/4 | 10.1s |
| #143 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 8.2 | 6.8 | $0.044 | 3/4 | 40.2s |
| #177 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 8.1 | 6.3 | $0.043 | 3/4 | 15.8s |
| #120 | Qwen3.7 Flash low | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.2 | $0.043 | 4/4 | 10.3s |
| #230 | Hy3 preview low | Tencent | 8.3 | 5.5 | $0.042 | 3/4 | 9.32s |
| #271 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 3.5 | 4.8 | $0.041 | 0/4 | 1.18s |
| #268 | Hy4 preview none | Tencent | 3.3 | 4.8 | $0.041 | 0/4 | 31.5s |